The detailed
overview of the advantages and disadvantages of both technologies. Comparisons
reflect typical characteristics, and may not hold for a specific device.
|
Attribute
or characteristic
|
Solid-state
drive
|
Hard
disk drive
|
|
Start-up
time
|
Almost instantaneous; no
mechanical components to prepare. May need a few milliseconds to come out of
an automatic power-saving mode.
|
Disk spin-up may take several
seconds. A system with many drives may need to stagger spin-up to limit peak
power drawn, which is briefly high when an HDD is first started.
|
|
Random
access time
|
About 0.1 ms - many times
faster than HDDs because data is accessed directly from the flash memory
|
Ranges from 2.9 (high end server
drive) to 12 ms (laptop HDD) due to the need to move the heads and wait for the data to rotate under the read/write
head.
|
|
Read
latency time
|
Generally low because the data can
be read directly from any location. In applications where hard disk seeks are
the limiting factor, this results in faster boot and application launch times.
|
Generally high since the
mechanical components require additional time to get aligned
|
|
Data
transfer rate
|
SSD technology can deliver rather
consistent read/write speed, but when lots of individual smaller blocks are
accessed, performance is reduced. In consumer products the maximum transfer
rate typically ranges from about 100 MB/s to 500 MB/s, depending on
the disk. Enterprise
market offers devices with multi-gigabyte per second throughput.
|
Once the head is positioned, when
reading or writing a continuous track, an enterprise HDD can transfer data at
about 140 MB/s. However accessing fragmented data implies a severe
performance penalty. Data transfer rate depends also upon rotational speed,
which can range from 4,200 to 15,000 rpm. and also upon the track
(reading from the outer tracks is faster due higher absolute head velocity
relative to the disk).
|
|
Consistent
read performance
|
Read performance does not change
based on where data is stored on an SSD
|
If data from different areas of
the platter must be accessed, as with fragmented files, response times will
be increased by the need to seek each fragment
|
|
Fragmentation
|
There is no benefit to reading
data sequentially (beyond typical FS block sizes), making fragmentation
irrelevant for SSDs. Defragmentation would cause wear by making additional
writes of the NAND flash cells, which have a limited cycle life
|
Files, particularly large ones, on
HDDs usually become fragmented over time if frequently written; periodic
defragmentation is required to maintain optimum performance.
|
|
Noise
(acoustic)
|
SSDs have no moving parts and
therefore are basically silent, although electric noise from the circuits may
occur.
|
HDDs have moving parts (heads, actuator,
and spindle motor) and make some sound; noise levels vary between models, but
can be significant (while often much lower than the sound from the cooling
fans).
|
|
Temperature
control
|
SSDs do not usually require any
special cooling and can tolerate higher temperatures than HDDs. High-end
enterprise models delivered as add-on cards may be supplied fitted with heat sinks to dissipate heat generated.
|
According to Seagate, ambient
temperatures above 95 °F (35 °C) can shorten the life of a hard disk,
and reliability will be compromised at drive temperatures above 131 °F
(55 °C). Fan cooling may be required if temperatures would otherwise
exceed these values.
In practice most hard drives are used without special arrangements for
cooling.
|
|
High
altitude operation
|
Can endure high altitude during
operation.
|
Specially manufactured sealed and
pressurized hard disks are needed for reliable high-altitude operation.
|
|
Susceptibility
to environmental factors
|
No moving parts, very resistant to
shock and vibration
|
Heads floating above rapidly rotating
platters are susceptible to shock and vibration
|
|
Installation
and mounting
|
Not sensitive to orientation,
vibration, or shock. Usually no exposed circuitry.
|
Circuitry may be exposed, and must
not contact metal parts. Most of recent models work well in all orientations.
Should be mounted to protect against vibration and shock.
|
|
Susceptibility
to magnetic fields
|
No impact on flash memory
|
Magnets or magnetic surges could
in principle damage data, although the magnetic platters are usually
well-shielded inside a metal case.
|
|
Weight
and size
|
Solid state drives, essentially
semiconductor memory devices mounted on a circuit board, are small and light
in weight. However, for easy replacement, they often follow the same form
factors as HDDs (3.5", 2.5" or 1.8").
|
HDDs often have the same form
factor but may be heavier. This is especially true for 3.5" drives.
|
|
Reliability
and lifetime
|
SSDs have no moving parts to fail
mechanically. Each block of a flash-based SSD can only be erased (and
therefore written) a limited number of times before it fails. The controllers
manage this limitation so that drives can last for many years under normal
use.SSDs based on DRAM do not have a limited number of writes. Firmware bugs
are currently a common cause for data loss.
|
HDDs have moving parts, and are
subject to potential mechanical failures from the resulting wear and tear.
|
|
Secure
writing limitations
|
NAND flash memory cannot be
overwritten, but has to be rewritten to previously erased blocks. If a
software encryption program encrypts data already on the SSD, the overwritten
data is still unsecured, unencrypted, and accessible (drive-based hardware
encryption does not have this problem). Also data cannot be securely erased
by overwriting the original file without special "Secure Erase"
procedures built into the drive.
|
HDDs can overwrite data directly
on the drive in any particular sector.
|
|
Cost
per capacity
|
NAD flash SSDs cost approximately
US$0.65 per GB
|
HDDs cost about US$0.05 per GB for
3.5 inch and $0.10 per GB for 2.5 inch drives
|
|
Storage
capacity
|
In 2011 SSDs were available in
sizes up to 2 TB, but less costly 64 to 256 GB drives were more
common.
|
In 2011 HDDs of up to 4 TB
were available.
|
|
Upgradability,
changeability, and/or downgradability
|
SSDs that follow the form factor
of HDD (3.5", 2.5", and 1.8") are either upgradeable,
changeable, or downgradable.
|
HDDs are definitely either
upgradeable, changeable, or downgradable.
|
|
Read/write
performance symmetry
|
Less expensive SSDs typically have
write speeds significantly lower than their read speeds. Higher performing
SSDs have similar read and write speeds.
|
HDDs generally have slightly lower
write speeds than their read speeds.
|
|
Free
block availability and TRIM
|
SSD write performance is
significantly impacted by the availability of free, programmable blocks.
Previously written data blocks no longer in use can be reclaimed by TRIM;
however, even with TRIM, fewer free blocks cause slower performance
|
HDDs are not affected by free
blocks and do not benefit from TRIM
|
|
Power
consumption
|
High performance flash-based SSDs
generally require half to a third of the power of HDDs. High-performance DRAM
SSDs generally require as much power as HDDs, and must be connected to power
even when the rest of the system is shut down
|
The lowest-power HDDs (1.8"
size) can use as little as 0.35 watts. 2.5" drives typically use 2 to 5
watts. The highest-performance 3.5" drives can use up to about 20 watts.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for visiting...